Japan's new helicopter destroyer

dacis2 · Nov 24th 2009, 7:22pm

http://www.asahi.com/english/Herald-...911230073.html

Maybe they'll even buy some F-35Bs for this.

Apocal · Nov 24th 2009, 7:25pm

Uh... yeah... "destroyer."

Who the fuck are they trying to fool? Although it is interesting that they mention it can carry fifty trucks. Insofar as trucks have about zero usefulness for any kind of naval warfare or amphibious warfare. Then again, if this is what they call a destroyer, the "truck" could very well be a fucking main battle tank.

Desert Fox · Nov 24th 2009, 7:29pm

Just a bit like their 35,000 ton Yamato class battleships armed with 16 inch guns

Alamo · Nov 24th 2009, 7:35pm

I don't know about you, but that looks pretty offensive to me.

FBH · Nov 24th 2009, 8:02pm

Helicopter destroyer is certainly an offensive name. It sounds like something tasked to shoot down helicopters.

dacis2 · Nov 24th 2009, 9:04pm

"Destroyer" in itself is a pretty offensive name. You'd only use it to destroy things.

"Peace Cruiser" would be nice, but their Consitution prevents them from having cruisers. *shrug*

Lord Squishy · Nov 24th 2009, 9:18pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by dacis2

"Destroyer" in itself is a pretty offensive name. You'd only use it to destroy things.

"Peace Cruiser" would be nice, but their Consitution prevents them from having cruisers. *shrug*

Peace Frigate?

Commander 598 · Nov 24th 2009, 9:29pm

To be fair, the preceding DDH ships, the Haruna and Shirane Classes, really were destroyers.

AdmiralTigercla · Nov 24th 2009, 9:33pm

I thought the restriction wasn't the naming convention, but the displacement tonnage.

They can call it whatever they want, so long as it doesn't violate the displacement tonnage rules.

Imperator Pax · Nov 24th 2009, 9:46pm

...well I think its cute seriously apocal thanks for the pic I'm going to use it for something... probably

Richardson · Nov 24th 2009, 10:03pm

uuuuummmm..... kinda limited in range from the looks of it, until they get a harrier or -35B.

At which point I intend to stay well away from the west coast.... just in case japan gets an itch to re-enact the good old days.... Juuuuuuuust in case.

ghost792 · Nov 24th 2009, 10:18pm

What's really interesting is that they intend to operate only 4 helos (three SH-60J and one MH-53E) even though the hanger can hold 11 SH-60s.

Bryan · Nov 24th 2009, 10:37pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by ghost792

What's really interesting is that they intend to operate only 4 helos (three SH-60J and one MH-53E) even though the hanger can hold 11 SH-60s.

That seems like a waste.

SuperS4 · Nov 24th 2009, 10:49pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bryan

That seems like a waste.

It's logistics, likely. They'll probably buy F-35Bs or perhaps some AV-8Bs(until the F-35B is ready). Granted, I can't see them getting AV-8Bs, first because it's no longer produced, so they'd have to get old airframes, and also because why get it, when in 3 years, the F-35B will be ready.

But, it depends on if Japan goes forward with procuring the F-35, the US is requesting 1billionJPY for basic information, and will only disclose more advanced information after Japan commits to purchasing it. So right now, no one knows for sure if Japan will get F-35s, As or Bs. Granted, the building of this class of ship certainly makes it seem likely they would.

Bryan · Nov 24th 2009, 11:52pm

1 billion Yen is what... like 50 million dollars?

kyee7k · Nov 24th 2009, 11:53pm

It's almost similar in size to ROK Navy's Dokdo-class amphibious assault ship.
With a hypothetical capability to carry up to 11 aircraft minus the 4 helicopters, how many of the 35s would the Hyuga be able to carry?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dokdo_c...s_assault_ship

PsyckoSama · Nov 24th 2009, 11:54pm

10 million dollars actually.

LoofahBoy · Nov 24th 2009, 11:55pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by dacis2

"Destroyer" in itself is a pretty offensive name. You'd only use it to destroy things.

"Peace Cruiser" would be nice, but their Consitution prevents them from having cruisers. *shrug*

Party boat?

dacis2 · Nov 25th 2009, 12:02am

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoofahBoy

Party boat?

Love boat

SuperS4 · Nov 25th 2009, 12:11am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bryan

1 billion Yen is what... like 50 million dollars?

As pointed out, between 10-11million. But that's just for basic information, nothing about its stealth systems or anything of that nature. It's likely mostly to do with its lift fan and basic shape.

dacis2 · Nov 25th 2009, 12:20am

Wouldn't more buyers be a big help to the F-35 program? Why set limits on a U.S. ally's ability to buy into the project?

dylanredefined · Nov 25th 2009, 12:46am

Quote:

Originally Posted by FBH

Helicopter destroyer is certainly an offensive name. It sounds like something tasked to shoot down helicopters.

Guess they took the name from the Royal Navys through deck cruiser."Honest it isn't really an aircraft carrier minster"

.

Apocal · Nov 25th 2009, 1:24am

Quote:

Originally Posted by dacis2

Wouldn't more buyers be a big help to the F-35 program? Why set limits on a U.S. ally's ability to buy into the project?

To make sure they are serious and not just wasting our time with bullshit that is never going through.

Quote:

Originally Posted by dylanredefined

Guess they took the name from the Royal Navys through deck cruiser."Honest it isn't really an aircraft carrier minster"

.

They had helicopter destroyers before this one, like Commander mentioned they were actual destroyers, just with some degree of enhanced helicopter support facilities.

SuperS4 · Nov 25th 2009, 1:40am

Quote:

Originally Posted by dacis2

Wouldn't more buyers be a big help to the F-35 program? Why set limits on a U.S. ally's ability to buy into the project?

Because the US wants to ensure people are actually going to buy the airplane, not just get all its secrets and build their own. Japan has a decent aerospace sector, and could easily build a plane like the F-35 if they got their hands on the more important details. So the US wants to ensure that they're not going to run off and make their own, they want the sale, and are only willing to part with insignificant details for $10mil, which is the normal price for joining the project(thereabouts) at the lower levels for just basic knowledge. Level 3s are all paying under $500mil, but over $100mil for their acceptance into the program. Israel and Singapore are part of the Security Cooperative Program members, Israel paid $20mil to get into it, don't know how much Singapore paid.

Skyllian Blitz · Nov 25th 2009, 1:46am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Apocal

To make sure they are serious and not just wasting our time with bullshit that is never going through.

Didn't the US have security issues with the Japanese at one stage, like how they sold their sub propeller CNC machines to the former USSR?

Nov 24th 2009, 7:22pm	#1
dacis2 Proud to be Singaporean. Commodore Join Date: 26 Nov 2001 Location: Singapore Posts: 14,281	Japan's new helicopter destroyer http://www.asahi.com/english/Herald-...911230073.html Maybe they'll even buy some F-35Bs for this. __________________ Yep, that's Altair. And yep, she's wearing thighhighs.

Nov 24th 2009, 7:25pm	#2
Apocal Inexperienced IL Senator Join Date: 22 Aug 2004 Location: Away Posts: 6,807	Uh... yeah... "destroyer." Who the fuck are they trying to fool? Although it is interesting that they mention it can carry fifty trucks. Insofar as trucks have about zero usefulness for any kind of naval warfare or amphibious warfare. Then again, if this is what they call a destroyer, the "truck" could very well be a fucking main battle tank. __________________ "Saying fuck is not as bad as pulling the trigger and sending hot steel through someone's chest." "Patriots make much of the dismal record of the French in matters military. Well, yes. It's hard to argue with failure. I note however that the French have Germany on their borders, a condition associated with military failure for everybody enjoying the same circumstances." -Fred Reed Last edited by Apocal; Nov 24th 2009 at 7:31pm.

Nov 24th 2009, 7:29pm	#3
Desert Fox Vulpine Tank Commander Commodore Join Date: 30 Nov 2003 Location: Riding in my Tank Posts: 13,707	Just a bit like their 35,000 ton Yamato class battleships armed with 16 inch guns __________________ If people are good only because they fear punishment and hope of reward, then we are a sorry lot indeed - Albert Einstein, German-born American Physicist

Nov 24th 2009, 7:35pm	#4
Alamo Registered Join Date: 6 Aug 2009 Location: Northwest Jersey Posts: 696	I don't know about you, but that looks pretty offensive to me. __________________ Posted by Nietzsche: Putin is Teddy Roosevelt, after the Russians dug up his body and rebuilt him from T-34 parts and designed him to run off Vodka and Kickass. Posted by BeerandGuns: The guy who wanted recipes for eating cats didn't get slammed like this. Posted by Hannibal: I'm sure by then there will be an AR upper capable of diverting the asteroid.

Nov 24th 2009, 9:04pm	#6
dacis2 Proud to be Singaporean. Commodore Join Date: 26 Nov 2001 Location: Singapore Posts: 14,281	"Destroyer" in itself is a pretty offensive name. You'd only use it to destroy things. "Peace Cruiser" would be nice, but their Consitution prevents them from having cruisers. shrug __________________ Yep, that's Altair. And yep, she's wearing thighhighs.

Nov 24th 2009, 9:29pm	#8
Commander 598 Agitated Aristocracy Join Date: 12 Jul 2006 Location: Random Swamp, Louisiana Posts: 3,201	To be fair, the preceding DDH ships, the Haruna and Shirane Classes, really were destroyers. __________________ +++++ Thought for the Day: His will be done, eventually. +++++ "It's bringing peace and love! Quick, break its legs!" "Yay! Now the Blue Helmets can drive their technicals on roads paved with human skulls as they set up their food for sex with children program!" - Lokar

Nov 24th 2009, 9:33pm	#9
AdmiralTigercla GCFA Fleet Command Otaku Join Date: 23 Nov 2006 Location: Subspace Posts: 10,514	I thought the restriction wasn't the naming convention, but the displacement tonnage. They can call it whatever they want, so long as it doesn't violate the displacement tonnage rules. __________________ "Escalating a war is NOT how I envisioned this vacation..." Ernest Hart OWNER: Samurai Penguin Studios. Magical Girl: Coming Soon.

Nov 24th 2009, 9:46pm	#10
Imperator Pax Talon Master Join Date: 29 Jul 2008 Location: Command Center Posts: 8,771	...well I think its cute seriously apocal thanks for the pic I'm going to use it for something... probably __________________ "WE HAVE COME FOR YOU!!" - Night Lords Legion "WE ARE RETURNED!" - Sons of Horus Legion "ALL IS DUST!" - Thousand Sons Legion "Repent for Tomorrow you Die!" - Dark Angels Legion

Nov 24th 2009, 10:03pm	#11
Richardson Champion of ROCK Join Date: 15 Dec 2007 Location: The Final Frontier Posts: 5,918	uuuuummmm..... kinda limited in range from the looks of it, until they get a harrier or -35B. At which point I intend to stay well away from the west coast.... just in case japan gets an itch to re-enact the good old days.... Juuuuuuuust in case. __________________ Trekkie Follower of the Red and Blue Orders, faithful to the Rules of Highly Effective Pirates, Builder of the SBSS Kep Salu Handwaves. This IS the kickass you are looking for. Go anywhere, and I will cut you down myself. Champion of the Gods of METAL, RICH the Awesome, master and commander of the MASTER OF WAVES, and generally the man who rocked out the end of the world.

Nov 24th 2009, 10:18pm	#12
ghost792 Registered Join Date: 7 Jul 2009 Posts: 799	What's really interesting is that they intend to operate only 4 helos (three SH-60J and one MH-53E) even though the hanger can hold 11 SH-60s.

Nov 24th 2009, 11:52pm	#15
Bryan The Great Goof! Join Date: 16 Dec 1999 Location: Octavia Posts: 32,042	1 billion Yen is what... like 50 million dollars? __________________ I am a goof!

Nov 24th 2009, 11:54pm	#17
PsyckoSama Ia! Ia! Kamina fthagn! Join Date: 30 Jun 2000 Posts: 13,736	10 million dollars actually. __________________ The very first Role-Playing Games took place in dungeon settings. Partly this was due to the symbolism inherent in the repressive setting of quasi-European feudal society, but mostly because it was because gamer guys thought hot elf chicks chained up by evil overlords were cool. "Orkses is never beaten in battle. If we win we win, if we die we die so it don't count as defeat. If we runs for it we don't die neither, so we can always cum back for anuvver go, see!"

Nov 25th 2009, 12:20am	#21
dacis2 Proud to be Singaporean. Commodore Join Date: 26 Nov 2001 Location: Singapore Posts: 14,281	Wouldn't more buyers be a big help to the F-35 program? Why set limits on a U.S. ally's ability to buy into the project? __________________ Yep, that's Altair. And yep, she's wearing thighhighs.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread: