scale sc,sw,w40k,tiberium,halo and UaW

general scale


INFATRY SCALE(some are canonical, others are obvious and others are based on my observation of the artwork, renders and concept art).
upload them to discuss and improve, if any that this erroneous
lines are used for the scale of 0.1 m or 0.2 m according to each image

general scale

grey knight

rebel aliance


federtion trade

wookie

conderation

imperial guard
 

Renrue

Prolixly Pleonastic Tautologist
Is there a measurement to the horizontal lines, such as one spacing of line equals 2 inches or whatnot?
 

white_rabbit

Shadow Cabal Berserker
I think I mentioned before, your Tyranid scale is a bit fucked up. Unless that human is a prodigious mutant, or the Nids are chibi-versions, then you've got some adjustments to make.

Not too sure about the Protoss either, The Zealot etc appear to be twelve foot tall or more, which when transposed onto your Zerg chart, makes them a touch out of scale.
 

Renrue

Prolixly Pleonastic Tautologist
Not too sure about the Protoss either, The Zealot etc appear to be twelve foot tall or more, which when transposed onto your Zerg chart, makes them a touch out of scale.
Hard numbers put Protoss at 3 meters tall. While definitely not 12 feet, I think they're at their right height assuming his scale is correct (each line being .2 m). The human figure is at 1.8 meters, being about 6 feet. So it seems quite right to me in that relation.

Besides the post-Brood Wars hydralisk, there's nothing to say the Zealot is out of scale with the Zerg. The post-Brood Wars hydralisk is larger than three meters, according to the Zeratul cinematic. Of course, considering Kerrigan is there, they may just be Hunter Killers, and taller than average hydralisks.
 
Hard numbers put Protoss at 3 meters tall. While definitely not 12 feet, I think they're at their right height assuming his scale is correct (each line being .2 m). The human figure is at 1.8 meters, being about 6 feet. So it seems quite right to me in that relation.

Besides the post-Brood Wars hydralisk, there's nothing to say the Zealot is out of scale with the Zerg. The post-Brood Wars hydralisk is larger than three meters, according to the Zeratul cinematic. Of course, considering Kerrigan is there, they may just be Hunter Killers, and taller than average hydralisks.
yes, the height of 3 m zealot is canon, so is in the original box for starcraft 1, also thought about the possibility that they are hunter killer
on tyrants, take measurements with a source lexicanum "Imperial Armour Volume IV," but I have not, so it may need confirmation
carnifex 5.5m, 2.8m broodlord, warrior 2.4m, lictor 2.4m, genestealer 1.9m and size gaunt know I put a tentative 1.2m , comparing it with a carnifex, in a art
 

Renrue

Prolixly Pleonastic Tautologist
Looking at the comparison chart (the first one), I actually have a qualm about the Space Marine height. Space Marines are genetically enhanced humans, and by default much taller than a normal human being. The sources vary, but I always assumed them to be about 8 feet.

I know the Terran Marine suit gives him a full extra foot, but I don't think they are that equal in size to the Space Marine, unless the SM suit don't give them any extra height.
 
The read some discussions and handles an average height as 7-7'6 "and 8 feet as less common
http://www.warseer.com/forums/showthread.php?t=139401&page=3
Here an fan, arises a variation in size by the old, the new Marines measure 7 feet
http://www.philipsibbering.com/WH40KRP/40K_9_Marine_1_Morphology.shtml
taking as an example dow2 scale (which seems realistic) is a comparison between Eldar and if the space marine space marine is 8 feet the Eldar are giants


this picture appeared on page old workshop in Germany but I do not know if it's official, the typical marine raised 7 feet, an abnormal 8 feet with their terminator armor. remember that the Marines vary in size as inteligncia as people except that their proportions are higher


on the increase, the armor seems minimal in fact the equivalent of the Terran cmc300 (of a normal human) is the terminator armor (for a marine espace)
 
The DoW games are not accurate in any sense of scale. ANY.

Space Marines START at 8 feet.
dow2 game to drive a scale for me not shows no contradiction with the reality of w40k the space marines have a physical proportion near his artistic representation, not forgetting that surely work shop supervised the development of the game to look as realistic , also if you see this image of workshop, when wearing a space marine is observed to be completely false height of 8 feet
 

Inquisitor Kard

Once Inquisitor Ryan
dow2 game to drive a scale for me not shows no contradiction with the reality of w40k the space marines have a physical proportion near his artistic representation, not forgetting that surely work shop supervised the development of the game to look as realistic , also if you see this image of workshop, when wearing a space marine is observed to be completely false height of 8 feet
Completely false based on the Chapter Serfs who are so because they failed at becoming Space Marines and are overly large in and of themselves?

I think not.
 
I did not know this, I thought that all the servants were simply criminals modified with cybernetic implants, best of all ways the difference was not great, but you say this here appears normal human recruited, with a chaplain
 
While I have reviewed four imperial armor and actions of some tyrants are incorrect
The carnifex is 4 m, the gaunt is 1.3m the old tyrant is 2.9m everything else is correct
in the case of the space marines in his volume dradnought for its size is 3.7m will review updates to ensure that

and about the size of the space marines,
 

Renrue

Prolixly Pleonastic Tautologist
I just need to know a little BattleTech or emergence of a video game, some link;)
BattleTech, via MechWarrior 4, is pretty straightforward. I have MechWarrior 4 and in the manual, it gives you all the mechs and their specific height in meters. They also have a tiny image of the pilot to the right to give a more broad scale.

Although, I don't really want to scan the whole booklet in and nor do I know where to find a link. Anyhow, most of the stuff is gigantic, so I don't think it would be a good scaling in with the infantry.

I'm also surprised on how Space Marines don't gain much height from their power armors. Although, I guess height in the end doesn't really matter. If you can have all the power and speed in a smaller package, it'll always be better.
 
yes, from what I've seen, it happens the same with supreme command. space Marines are good but I like the use of exoskeleton terran meets almost all the requirements without the lengthy procedure(clearly a result of lower quality but easier to do). Now imagine the army of Terminators contemplated by the emperor before the heresy
 
This site from GW has art for the Tyranids. Might help with ths scaling, since the scaling above is very off I think

You might thinking of increasing all the nids by at least 1/3rd with relation to the human..
outside the majestic Trygon not see anything abnormal about scales

Genestealers are way too small. They are like near terminator sized.
if you follow the perspective you get the head to the base of the terminator mask not unlike the scale
is in fact a hive tyrant
this scale are of imperial armour IV


 
is in fact a hive tyrant
No, it's not. I've been playing the games since it was Rogue Trader. That's a tyranid Warrior. The hive tyrants at the time were markedly different looking. In fact I have those tyranid warriors (Rather my wife does, she plays 'nids and has in teh range of 8000 points (Or did, don't have the newest codex). I play Necron, and Witch Hunter). They revamped the figs later on into the more crouched models. But even the models are bigger than shown.

Your scaling has the human at like chin level of the tyranid warrior where clearly the Imperial Armour picture shows them at just at like the bottom of the sternum.

In fact Here. Top few photos show an old style tyranid hive tyrant followed by the old style tyranid warriors (Which match the eldar pic exactly).
 

white_rabbit

Shadow Cabal Berserker
Thank god, I was wondering how you could read Imperial armour and think your tyranid warrior was to scale.

Look at the pictures, you can't take a scale thats defined in context with different postures and apply it to completely different images.

In particular, look at the Tyranid Shrike.

And Mobiboros is absolutely right, I've got some of those Warriors myself.
 
Thank god, I was wondering how you could read Imperial armour and think your tyranid warrior was to scale.

Look at the pictures, you can't take a scale thats defined in context with different postures and apply it to completely different images.

In particular, look at the Tyranid Shrike.

And Mobiboros is absolutely right, I've got some of those Warriors myself.
white rabbit if you're right, I planned to modify , in my previous message is that measures are generally correct(this scale, I did before having the book), but if they are affected by the position in the case of the warrior, but in another are favored as in the lictor or gaunt, geneetealer is correct, in the case of carnifex like this in my scale is larger than the book, soon I'll upload a better scale


No, it's not. I've been playing the games since it was Rogue Trader. That's a tyranid Warrior. The hive tyrants at the time were markedly different looking. In fact I have those tyranid warriors (Rather my wife does, she plays 'nids and has in teh range of 8000 points (Or did, don't have the newest codex). I play Necron, and Witch Hunter). They revamped the figs later on into the more crouched models. But even the models are bigger than shown.

Your scaling has the human at like chin level of the tyranid warrior where clearly the Imperial Armour picture shows them at just at like the bottom of the sternum.

In fact Here. Top few photos show an old style tyranid hive tyrant followed by the old style tyranid warriors (Which match the eldar pic exactly).
Today 12:03pm
sorry for talk without first ensuring, i think that you're correct,but the old warrior appears higher
 
Top